8 Oct.12 Oslo, Norway
| Document Title | ENG | Presentations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Notice 1 | PDF 30 Jan.12 |
||
| Information Notice 2 | PDF 12 Feb.12 |
||
| Agenda | PDF 19 Sept.12 |
||
| Document Template | DOC 14 Mar.12 |
||
| Latex Template | ZIP 8 May 12 |
||
| Report of the meeting | PDF 9 Nov.12 |
||
| (i) Selective and macro editing | |||
| Introduction-Discussion |
PPT |
||
| WP.2 | Optimization as a theoretical framework to selective editing (Spain) | PDF 20 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.3 | Multivariate selective editing via mixture models: first applications to Italian structural business surveys (Italy) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.4 | An application of Selective Editing to the U.S. Census Bureau Trade Data (U.S. Census Bureau) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.5 | Tree Analysis – A Method for Constructing Edit Groups (Sweden) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.6 | An automated comparison of statistics (Germany) | PDF 8 Oct.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.7 | The Use of Evaluation Data Sets When Implementing Selective Editing (Sweden) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.8 | Selective editing as a part of the estimation procedure (Italy) | PDF 6 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| (ii) Global solutions to editing | |||
| Introduction-Discussion | PPT 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.9 | Review of the UNECE Glossary of Terms on Statistical Data Editing (New Zealand) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.10 | General flow of editing (Netherlands/Norway) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.11 | Update on the development of GSIM (Australia/UNECE) | PDF 13 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.12 | Two Paradigms for Official Statistics Production (Sweden) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.13 | Proposal of a revised approach for data validation within the European Statistical System (Eurostat) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.14 | The development of a data editing and imputation tool set (Canada) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.15 | On tap: developments in statistical data editing at Statistics New Zealand (New Zealand) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| (iii) Editing and Imputation in the context of data integration from multiple sources and mixed modes | |||
| Introduction | PPT 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.16 | Micro integration of register-based census data for dwelling and household (Norway) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.17 | All answers? Statistics New Zealand’s Integrated Data Infrastructure (New Zealand) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.18 | Editing challenges for new data collection methods (United Kingdom) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.19 | Methodological Questions Raised by the Combined Use of Administrative and Survey Data for French Structural Business Statistics (France) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.20 | Studying the Options of Substituting a Regular Statistical Survey with Administrative Data (Hungary) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.21 | Evolving data processing in the statistics centre(Abu-Dhabi) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.22 | Editing and imputing VAT data for the Purpose of Producing Mixed-Source Turnover Estimates (United Kingdom) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.23 | Imputing missing values when using administrative data for short-term enterprise statistics (Netherlands) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.24 | Improvement of the Timeliness of the Italian Business Register via Imputation of Missing information in Administrative data (Italy) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| (iv) Using metadata and paradata to analyse the efficiency of editing processes | |||
| Introduction | PPT 8 Oct.12 |
||
| Discussion | PPT 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.25 | Assessment and improvement of the selective editing process in Esane (France) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.26 | Outlining a Process Model for Editing With Quality Indicators (Finland) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.27 | An Embedded Experiment to Test Non-Response Follow-Up Strategies when Using Electronic Questionnaires (Canada) |
PDF |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.28 | Editing staff debriefings at Statistics Sweden (Sweden) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| (v) Software & tools for data editing and imputation | |||
| Introduction | PDF 8 Oct.12 |
||
| Discussion | PDF 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.29 | TEA, a generalized system designed to unify and streamline demographic survey processing (U.S. Census Bureau) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.30 | Innovative visual tools for data editing (Netherlands) | PDF 8 Oct.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.31 | Interactive Adjustment and Outlier Detection in time dependent data in R (Austria) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.32 | Screening Methods and Tools for UNIDO Industrial Statistics (INDSTAT) Databases (UNIDO) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.33 | Automatic data editing with open source R (Netherlands) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.34 | Application of developed SAS Macro for editing and imputation in Statistics Lithuania (Lithuania) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.35 | Multiple Imputation of Turnover in EDINET Data: Toward the Improvement of Imputation for the Economic Census (Japan) | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| (vi) New and emerging methods | |||
| Introduction-Discussion | PPT 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.36 | Sweden/Estonia – Probability editing | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PDF 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.37 | Eurostat – Use of Machine Learning Methods for Categorical Data Imputation | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.38 | Slovenia – Implementation of the Bayesian approach to imputation at SORS | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.39 | Netherlands – Automatic editing with hard and soft edits – some first experiences | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| (vii) Editing and imputation of census data | |||
| Introduction |
PDF |
||
| Discussion | PDF 8 Oct.12 |
||
| WP.40 | Slovenia – Editing of multiple source data in the case of Slovenian Agricultural Census 2010 | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.41 | Austria – The data imputation process of the Austrian register-based Census | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.42 | United Kingdom – Item imputation of Census data in an automated production environment; advantages, disadvantages and diagnostics | PDF 14 Sept. 12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.43 | United Kingdom – The Practical Implementation of the 2011 UK Census Imputation Methodology | PDF 14 Sept. 12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.44 | Abu Dhabi – Edit And Imputation of the 2011 Abu Dhabi Census | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |
| WP.45 | Mexico – Editing Census Data: Mexico’s experience | PDF 3 Sep.12 |
PPT 8 Oct.12 |