Expert Forum for Producers and Users of Climate Change-related Statistics 2022

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The main objective of the session was to provide a common foundation for the rest of the Expert Forum. The session was an opportunity to:

• Take stock of the recent work of the Steering Group and the new UNECE Task Force on the role of NSOs in achieving national climate objectives
• Share information about recent developments at the global level
• Share information about other relevant initiatives related to the production, dissemination and use of climate change-related statistics, including institutional aspects.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Giovanna Tagliacozzo (ISTAT) and Christiana Photiadou (European Environment Agency)

This session followed up on the related sessions at the 2020 and 2021 Expert Fora. The presentations and conclusions from the previous meetings are available on the meeting websites in English and Russian: 2020 Expert Forum and 2021 Expert Forum.

Understanding climate change vulnerability and resilience, and planning adaptation to climate change is an increasingly important component of climate change response. However, their measurement still poses significant challenges. Vulnerability, exposure, risk appetite and adaptation actions vary between and within countries and regions and over time, and are interconnected. The information needs are highly context-specific, and it seems impossible to define a fully harmonized, internationally agreed set of statistics and indicators.

In August 2020, the Steering Group on Climate Change-Related Statistics conducted a survey to determine what NSOs do in this area. Many countries reported that they undertake some statistical activities related to climate change adaptation, such as producing statistics, linking and disseminating data from other producers or supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans. The Expert Fora concluded that further work should include sharing best practices, starting with available relevant indicators, analysing interlinkages, clustering relevant thematic areas and creating taxonomies.

The session:

• Shared and discussed practical examples of climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience statistics and indicators used in countries.
• Shared experience of other activities related to providing data on climate change adaptation, vulnerability and resilience, i.e., a presentation, paper and/or case study on, e.g., linking and disseminating data from other producers, supporting monitoring of national adaptation plans, providing data for risk maps, including nature-based solution strategies.
• Shared knowledge and good practices of statistical, policy and research communities working on climate change adaptation, vulnerability, resilience, and hazardous events and disasters.
• Discussed what is needed to accelerate progress in this area, e.g., by identifying the highest priority activities and better coordinating each other’s efforts.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Pouya Taghavi-Moharamli and Roberta Quadrelli (International Energy Agency) and Rob Smith (Midsummer Analytics)

The session discussed innovative approaches to improving climate change-related statistics.

The first part of the session focused on addressing data gaps for producing climate change indicators, including strengthening primary data collection, using modern data sources and emerging technologies. The second part of the session looked at other innovations such as improving timeliness, frequency and granularity of GHG emission estimates, developing new indicators and measuring linkages between climate impacts and socioeconomic development.

Session organizers: Arthur Denneman (UNECE Steering Group Chair, Statistics Netherlands) and Malgorzata Cwiek (UNECE Secretariat)

The session discussed the conclusions of the Expert Forum highlighting concrete issues for further work and ways to respond to emerging issues. The conclusions will feed into further work of UNECE in climate change-related statistics and provide input for the planning of the next Expert Forum in 2023.