| Document title | Documents | Presentations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tentative Timetable | |||
| Information Notice 1 | |||
| Information Notice 2 | |||
| Report | |||
| Latex template | ZIP | ||
| Word template | DOC | ||
|
|
|||
Topic 1: Access to Statistical Data for Scientific Purposes |
|||
|
Access to EU microdata for research purposes |
|||
| Creating a National Remote Access System for Register-based Research Finland |
|||
| New Nordic model for researchers joint access to data from the Nordic Statistical Institution Denmark |
|||
| Circle of Trust for International Microdata Access Germany |
|||
| Virtual Research Environments (VREs) to enable access to confidential data for scientific purposes Germany |
|||
| Micro, remote, safe settings (safePODS) – extending a safe setting network across a country University of Edinburgh |
|||
| Access to Statistical Data for Scientific Purposes Montenegro |
|||
| Evidence-based, context-sensitive, user-centred, risk-managed SDC planning: designing data access solutions for scientific use Saarland State University of Applied Sciences, University of Dortmund, University of the West of England & UK Data Service |
|||
Topic 2: Identifying and measuring risk of statistical disclosure |
|||
| Microdata protection: A method that mixes subsampling and calibration France |
|||
| Microdata Masking as Permutation Univ. Oklahoma & Univ. Rovira I Virgili |
|||
| Assessing Disclosure Risk via Record Linkage Universitat Rovira I Virgili |
|||
| Transparency in microaggregation Univ. Skövde |
|||
| Disclosure Risk Measurement with Entropy in Two-Dimensional Sample Based Frequency Tables Univ. Manchester |
|||
| Running an analysis of combined data when the individual records cannot be combined Univ. Edinburgh, Univ. Bristol & Glasgow Centre for Population Health |
|||
Topic 3: Emerging Challenges to Data Confidentiality |
|||
| Confidentialized Analysis of Microdata - CSPA project Canada & Australia |
|||
| Protection of frequency tables – current work at Statistics Sweden Sweden |
|||
| Development of rules from administrative data Canada |
|||
Topic 4: Practicum: Case Studies and Software |
|||
| Creating synthetic microdata from official statistics: Random number generation in consideration of Anscombe's quartet Hitotsubashi Univ. & Chuo Univ. |
|||
| A Graphical User Interface to Manage Cell Suppression on Sets of Linked Tables Using SAS and t Argus Germany |
|||
| Public Use Files of EU-SILC and EU-LFS data Netherlands |
|||
| Statistical data confidentiality and microdata in Albania Albania |
|||
| The application for statistical processing at SURS Slovenia |
|||
| synthpop: An R package for generating synthetic versions of sensitive microdata for statistical disclosure limitation Univ. Edinburgh |
|||
| New online services for accessing PHC microdata for any user Romania |
|||
| The RAIRD Project: Remote Access Infrastructure for Register Data Norway |
|||
| An Introduction to the Administrative Data Research Network Univ. Essex |
|||
| Statistical confidentiality assurance framework in State Statistics Service of Ukraine Ukraine |
|||
Topic 5: Preserving Data Quality and Usability in Disclosure-Limited Data |
|||
| Generating synthetic geocoding information for public release Germany & Duke Univ. |
|||
| Anonymization of longitudinal surveys in the presence of outliers Saarland State Univ. Applied Sciences |
|||
| Using partially synthetic microdata to protect sensitive cells in business statistics U.S. Bureau of the Census & Cornell Univ. |
|||
| Quantitative Assessment of Data Confidentiality and Data Utility to Create Anonymized Census Microdata in Japan Chuo Univ. & Japan |
|||
Topic 6: New Methodologies for Protecting Data (Disclosure Limitation) |
|||
| Utility of synthetic microdata generated using parametric and tree-based methods Univ. Edinburgh |
|||
| Formal privacy protection for data products combining individual and employer frames Duke Univ., U.S. Census Bureau & Cornell Univ. |
|||
| Using BCD CTA for difficult tables: a practical experiment with a real Eurostat table Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya & Netherlands |
|||
| Techniques to apply cell suppression to large sparse linked tables and some results using those techniques on the 2012 (US) Economic Census United States of America |
|||
| General discussion and conclusions | |||
| Panel discussion |
Work session on statistical data confidentiality
05 - 07 October 2015
Helsinki Finland