The national training session was organised to improve knowledge of experts of the government of the Republic of Moldova in the area of identification of hazardous activities under the Convention.
National training session for Moldova on the identification of hazardous activities
National training session for Moldova on the identification of hazardous activities
09 March (10:00) - 10 March (18:00) 2010
Chisinau Republic of Moldova
Presentations
| Document Title | ENG | FRE | RUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Session I - the Industrial Accidents Convention in Moldova | |||
| The Convention in Moldova, responsibilities of the authorities for the implementation of identification of hazardous activities, prevention, preparedness, response and coordination between authorities – Ms. Svetlana Stirbu, (Moldova) | --- | --- | |
| Identification of hazardous activities in Moldova, legal framework – Ms. Natalia Andrias, (Moldova) | --- | --- | |
| SESSION II – Good practices for the identification of hazardous activities under the Convention | |||
| The Bulgarian approach to the identification of hazardous activities under the Convention – Mr. Nikolay Savov, (Bulgaria) | --- | --- | |
| - Case study 1 | --- | --- | |
| - Case study 2 | --- | --- | |
| Gaps identified in the legal and institutional framework in Moldova, on collecting, processing and maintaining data on hazardous activities – Mr. Gavril Gilca (Moldova) | --- | --- | --- |
| SESSION III – Annex I to the Convention as an instrument to identify hazardous activities | |||
| Current procedures in Moldova for the analysis of chemicals/substances, – Mr. Mihail Mustea, (State Ecological Inspections) | --- | --- | |
| Annex I of the Convention and its application for the identification of hazardous activities – Mr. Nikolay Savov | --- | --- | |
| SESSION IV – Location criteria for the identification of hazardous activities – application of scenarios, risk assessment and location criteria | |||
| Location criteria for activities involving substance that may be released in to water paths and air path in case of accidents – Ms. Virginia Fusé | --- | --- | |
| Presentation of the case study on ‘worst-case scenario’ – Mr. Nikolay Savov | --- | --- | |
| - Case study 1 | --- | --- | |
| - Case study 2 | --- | --- | |
| Inspection regarding the main conclusions of the training session in Prague – Mr. Segiu Croitor | --- | --- | --- |