Skip to main content

Public participation and water resources management: where do we stand in international law?

Public participation and water resources management: where do we stand in international law?

13 December 2013
Geneva Switzerland

The conference was co-organized jointly by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the Platform for International Water Law of the University of Geneva, with the financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

The conference provided an opportunity to analyse current trends and innovative thinking for the involvement of non-state actors in the management of freshwater resources. It also provided a platform to discuss good practices to ensure public participation in decision-making for freshwater resources management and access to justice.

More information is available at: http://www.unige.ch/droit/eau/conferences/2013/ConfPP2013_en.html
 

Document ENG FR
Draft programme of the conference PDF PDF
List of participants PDF  

 

Presentations ENG
Session 1: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ITS REGIONAL VARIANTS  
Public participation and the Protocol on Water and Health
Chantal Demilecamps, UNECE
PDF
Public participation in the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River
Benedikt Mandl, ICPDR
PDF
The Guarani Aquifer Agreement and the role of non-State actors
Francesco Sindico, University of Strathclyde
PDF
The state of the integrated water resources management process in the of the Niger Basin: the experience of the involvement of non-state actors
Robert Dessouassi, Observatory of the Niger Basin (ABN)
PDF
Public participation in the Senegal River Basin Development Organization
Komlan Sangbana, University of Geneva
PDF
The principle of public participation and the International Joint Commission between Canada and United States
Mara Tignino, University of Geneva
PDF
Session 2: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, COMPLIANCE AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES  
Public participation in water resources management, the Aarhus Convention and its innovative compliance mechanism
Fiona Marshall, UNECE
 
The Bystroe case and the Implementation Committee of the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context
Félix Zaharia, Vice-chair of the Espoo Convention Implementation Committee
 
Justice by any other name? The complaint mechanisms of development banks
Vanessa Richard, University of Aix-Marseille
PDF
Access to water and human rights courts
Owen McIntyre, University College of Cork
PDF
Session 3: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: THE ROLE OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ACTORS  
The interactions between international law and domestic law: the case of India
Philippe Cullet, University of London
PDF
Public participation in the case of Rhone River, a new reading in terms of social, substantial and procedural efficiency
Géraldine Pflieger and Christian Bréthaut, University of Geneva
PDF
Public participation in river basin joint bodies: the role of NGOs
Serhiy Vykhryst, European ECO-Forum
PDF