STATEMENT BY Ms. DANUTA HÜBNER, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE
ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE
at the Multi-stakeholder forum on sustainable energy in a
competitive market: forging partnerships on the occasion of the tenth session
of the Committee on Sustainable Energy (31 october - 2 november 2000)
Distinguished panellists and delegates,
It is with pleasure that I welcome you to the Forum on Sustainable Energy. This Forum
is a crucial element of "the energy week" we are having here in the United
Nations Economic Commission for Europe in Geneva. We need a debate that could contribute
to what the Committee on Sustainable Energy will discuss and adopt tomorrow. We need this
debate also in the context of the ninth annual session of the UN Commission on Sustainable
Development. So, as you see, it is not a sheer coincidence, this meeting has been
organized to coincide with the tenth session of the Committee on Sustainable Energy.
At last years session, the Committee on Sustainable Energy decided to contribute
a regional perspective to the preparations and lead-up to the 2001 annual session of the
UN Commission on Sustainable Development. CSD-9, as it is commonly known, will address
sustainability issues related to environment and energy as well as transport. This Forum
is also intended as a contribution to these preparations.
Tomorrow you will be discussing and adopting a declaration, a policy statement on
sustainable energy development in the ECE region. You will also decide on follow up
initiatives for your Committee. I hope that todays presentations and debate will
help to frame this policy statement as well as to provide suggestions on follow up
actions.
As you are aware, a number of documents are available to guide your deliberations today
and tomorrow. These include: a paper providing an overview of the key energy
sustainability issues confronting ECE countries; a document addressing, in greater detail,
two of these key issues, namely, (a) energy intensity and efficiency, and (b) energy
pricing, subsidization and internalization of externalities; and a paper on five specific
follow up initiatives for the Committees consideration. I would also like to draw
your attention to the already mentioned draft proposal for the Policy Statement on
Sustainable Energy Development which was made available to you as a room document
yesterday.
One should be humble and modest when speaking on energy to such a forum of most
knowledgeable officials and experts. Nevertheless I would like to take some of your time
and comment on a number of policy challenges that you will be addressing during the course
of the next two days. I will deal briefly with four issues. These are: (1) the changing
policy and market environment; (2) sustainable development; (3) energy efficiency; and (4)
the internalization of externalities. The latter two topics will be the subject of your
deliberations during the course of this Forum.
The Changing Policy and Market Environment
Energy has been and will be the issue on policy and development agenda for years. The
"winds of change", not only European, but also global are buffeting energy
markets, industries and enterprises. Governments in central and eastern Europe as well as
in central Asia are busy reshaping, restructuring and, in some cases, privatizing their
energy industries. In western Europe and North America, governments are aggressively
opening up and liberalizing energy markets, notably the natural gas and electricity
markets. These processes do take place also in some central and eastern European
countries. At the same time, liberalization and globalization are favouring the
concentration of capital and labour into ever larger and larger multinational energy
companies, raising concerns about excessive market power.
Environmental and health concerns, and to some degree safety concerns, continue to
challenge energy industries. World oil prices are once again volatile, affecting other
energy prices and raising concerns about inflation and economic growth. Energy taxation,
which was never very popular with energy producers and consumers, is increasingly coming
under scrutiny and a source of discontentment among some groups in society. Anxiety over
energy security, which abated in the 1980s and 1990s, is once again re-emerging, and
receiving increasing public and policy attention.
Indeed, energy market, energy industries and government energy policies are in a
significant state of flux. Strategic choices are being made, there is certainly the
opportunity to take advantage of some of these developments to facilitate the transition
to a more sustainable energy future. There are also developments which work against such
transition.
But despite the uncertainty, contradictory tendencies and to some extent anxiety
generated by these evolving changes, it is important to take stock of the progress made so
far and what lies ahead. Furthermore, it is imperative to press on with national and
global efforts to chart a path to a more sustainable energy future. This is precisely why
we are assembled here today. Hopefully, we can agree over the next two days to take one
more step along this path.
Indeed, a lot of progress has already been made in that direction. For example, the
natural environment today in many ECE countries is in a much better shape than it was just
a few years ago as a result of the efforts of private individuals, governments,
international community, industry and non-governmental organizations. In this regard, I
should mention our work here, in the ECE, which through the development of international
legal instruments, norms and standards as well as through the harmonization and
convergence of policies and practices, has significantly contributed to this positive
record.
We all know that significant strides to control pollution and protect the health of
individuals and the environment have been made by energy industries. But there is still a
long way to go to achieve a sustainable energy future. What helps is that today we know
that energy can be made sustainable.
Sustainable Development
The concept of sustainable development has fundamentally changed the way we view the
relationship between energy, the environment, and the economy. The old paradigm
emphasising the trade off between a healthy environment, a secure energy future and a
prosperous economy, emphasising that a choice needs to be made among the three when
decisions are taken - has now been discarded. While we continue to have different
definitions of precisely what sustainable development means, the bottom-line is that high
levels of environmental quality, the availability of energy at reasonable prices, and
economic prosperity are complementary and mutually reinforcing.
We also know that there is no conflict between environmental protection and economic
competitiveness. This false dichotomy stems from a narrow view of the sources of
prosperity and a static view of competition. No longer is it questioned today that
standards in areas such as health, safety and the environment can play an important role
in promoting competitiveness and prosperity by stimulating innovations in products and
processes that are highly valued in international markets.
I raise these issues because income disparities within countries and across countries
in the ECE region are large and rising. Therefore, there could be the temptation to
ascribe environmental protection as a rich country preoccupation. This would be wrong and
short-sighted. It is not a luxury, it is the best investment in the future.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
This morning you will be focussing your attention on the issue of energy intensity and
energy efficiency. One of the main avenues for curbing energy-related environmental
problems is to improve energy conservation and efficiency. The issue is most acute in
countries of central and eastern Europe and of central Asia where energy intensity levels
are so much higher than those in western countries of the ECE region.
In todays world, this is both an economic as well as an environmental liability.
The need to improve overall energy conservation and efficiency is well recognized by all
governments in countries with transitional economies. There is full awareness of a huge
economic potential for reducing energy intensity and improving energy efficiency. But,
unfortunately, energy saving is not altogether a costless endeavour even though the
potential is vast and payback periods short in economies in transition. Energy saving
usually requires some investment. Moreover, the lack of capital, poorly functioning
financial markets and liquidity constraints have hampered progress in this area.
Nonetheless, it is imperative for countries in central and eastern Europe and central
Asia to use the momentum, the window of opportunity that transition generates and
implement energy efficiency measures precisely now when economic structures are being
transformed and modernized so that the resulting new infrastructure is as energy efficient
as it can be. More generally, it is important to encourage countries with transitional
economies to liberalize energy markets, to implement market based pricing structures, to
foster private ownership, to introduce other economic reforms and to make use of
up-to-date technologies and procedures in order to enhance a better allocation of national
resources and the more efficient production and consumption of energy.
But sustainable development cannot become a reality on a global scale without further
marked improvements in energy efficiency in western ECE countries. This is in spite of the
high energy efficiency levels already achieved in those countries. The rate of decline in
energy intensity in western countries has slowed down markedly over the last decade. Ways
will have to be found to accelerate the decline in energy intensity and to improve energy
efficiency.
Internalization of Externalities
Energy prices play a critical role in bringing energy supply and demand into balance,
and in affecting consumer behaviour. Hence, energy pricing can potentially be a potent
instrument for affecting behaviour. In a market economy, prices seldom reflect the social
and environmental costs, commonly referred to as negative externalities, attributable to
the production and use of commodities and resources. In essence, the marketplace
frequently fails to reflect the true value of environmental resources, especially those
that are held in common, such as air or water resources.
Herein lies the problem that has preoccupied governments since the advent of the
environmental era and, perhaps, even before. How best to ensure that such external costs
are fully and systematically taken into account in everyday decision making.
In the past, governments have favoured mandatory norms, standards and regulations. In
recent years, more attention has been paid to the use of economic instruments, including
fiscal measures, such as, emissions trading, energy taxes and environmental levies. These
work through the market to give producers and consumers the incentive to include
environmental considerations, in making their choices.
Currently, most western governments are pursuing energy policies underpinned by three
basic principles:
- that consumers should have as much choice as possible in terms of fuels and sources
of supply;
- that the best way to promote greater economic efficiency and reduce costs is by
enhancing competition in the marketplace; and
- that the economic dividends, resulting from increased efficiency, should be passed on
to consumers in the form of lower energy prices. At least, consumers are demanding that
this is so.
The problem is that these policies are more likely to increase energy demand than to
depress it. To counteract this tendency, governments have been examining the use of
economic instruments, yet, they have only been sparingly used so far, as compared to
regulations and standards. Energy taxation in particular has been quite controversial.
In countries with economies in transition, governments are confronted with difficult
choices. Broadly speaking, energy prices have been significantly increased in recent years
in most transitional economies, in some of them energy prices have been dramatically
raised, contributing to inflation and deterioration of the living standard. In spite of
that they are still below economic levels and the cross-subsidization of households
continues. A radical change is not feasible because of the impact that energy price
increases have on inflation, on disposable household income and on employment in
vulnerable industries. However, this situation cannot be sustained for long.
This afternoon, you will have the opportunity to debate these rather thorny and
difficult issues related to energy subsidization, energy pricing and the internalization
of externalities, notably environmental externalities. If there are divergent points of
view among this audience, it is certainly on these issues.
Conclusion
To be successful, the transition to a sustainable energy future has to be viewed as a
"projet de société". In other words, it must be a collaborative effort by all
partners of the civil society. The ultimate objective will only be achieved if all
contribute, collaborate, give and take, and are respectful of each others point of
view. Tomorrow, you will be asked to adopt a policy statement on sustainable energy
development in the ECE region. You will also be asked to consider some follow up
initiatives. Here also choices will have to be made since it will not be possible to
undertake every suggestion. Your resources as well as those of the Secretariat are
limited. I trust that your wisdom and imagination will help you make the right choice
this is not going to be easy because we all know that everything matters.
In conclusion, I would like to express my appreciation to all of you, representing ECE
Governments, the business community, non-government organizations and other international
organizations, for your participation at the Forum and the valuable support you have given
to the Committee and its subsidiary bodies over the years.
In particular, I would like to thank the panellists that will speak this morning and
this afternoon. We appreciate very much your readiness to share your precious time with us
and, what is more important, to share your views on the challenges facing ECE countries on
these very important matters.
Ladies and gentlemen, I thank you for your attention and I wish you much success in
your deliberations.