| topic (iv): Best practices for enterprise/population statistics - CANCELLED |
|
| topic (v): Successful strategies for implementing new editing and imputation methods |
|
|
|
| Implementation of the new system of French structural business statistics (France), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Far from normal – Multiple imputation of missing values in a German establishment survey (Germany), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Evolution of Canadian census E&I systems – 1976 to 2011 (Canada), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| The development of an edit improvement process (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Toward a comprehensive editing and imputation structure for NASS – Integrating the Parts (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Decentralized multi-country imputation: the case of the Euro Area Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS) (European Central Bank), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Data validation strategy in Eurostat, Supporting paper |
|
|
| topic (vi): New and emerging methods |
|
|
|
| A selective editing approach based on contamination models: an application to an Istat business survey (Italy), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| A triple-goal imputation method for statistical registers (Norway), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Imputation of item non-responses in compositional data using robust methods (Austria), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Mass imputation for building a numerical statistical database (Netherlands/University of Southampton), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Automatic correction of simple typing errors in numerical data with balance edits (Netherlands), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Potential operational improvements of the Hulliger’s criterion for managing outliers in longitudinal sampling surveys (Italy), Supporting paper |
|
|
| topic (vii): Indicators for measuring the quality impact of data editing and imputation |
|
|
|
| Strategy for monitoring the 2011 Canadian Census E&I (Canada), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Metadata and quality indicators to report on editing and imputation to different users (Italy), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| On the influence of imputation methods on Laeken indicators: Simulations and Recommendations (Austria), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Using quality indicators to choose an imputation method for large firms (Switzerland), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Overview on editing and imputation practices at Statistics Finland, Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Determining a set of edits and quality of a database (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
| topic (viii): Selective and macro editing |
|
|
|
| Outlier detection in survey data using robust methods (Austria/UNIDO), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Setting cut-off scores for selective editing in structural business statistics: an automatic procedure using a simulation study (France), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Assessing the impact of selective editing on data quality (United Kingdom), Invited paper |
|
|
|
|
| Implementing selective editing and imputation methods in foreign trade statistics (Germany), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Process enhancement and improvement of a macro editing approach (United States), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation of selective editing in SLP 2008 (Sweden), Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Selective editing for Business Surveys at Statistics Canada, Supporting paper |
|
|
|
|
| Usefulness of estimation on target variables during the data production process and prioritizing follow-ups (France), Supporting paper |
|
|
