Skip to main content

Environmental Performance Reviews Publications

Displaying Results 61 - 80 of 81

- English
This is the first EPR of Romania. Thereafter, the review team of international experts included experts from Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, together with experts from the secretariat of the United
- English
This is the first EPR of Uzbekistan. The review team of international experts was constituted. It included experts from Armenia, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Poland and the Russian Federation together with experts from the secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for
- English
The report is the first EPR of Kazakhstan. The review team included national experts from Finland, France, Denmark, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uzbekistan, together with the ECE secretariat, UNEP and the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health
- English
This report is about the 1st EPR of Kyrgyzstan. The review team was constituted following these decisions and included national experts from Armenia, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and the Russian Federation, together with the ECE secretariat, experts from the International Strategy for
- English
A first Environmental Performance Review of Bulgaria had been undertaken in 1995 as a joint project between ECE and OECD. In September 1999, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy agreed to the Bulgarian request for a second review by UNECE. The project was the first second-round review of
- English
This is the first EPR of Armenia. The review team for the project was constituted and included national experts from Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Slovakia and the Russian Federation, together with the ECE secretariat, experts from UNEP and from the Rome Division of the WHO European Centre for
- English
The EPR of Ukraine started with its preparatory mission in November 1997. This mission resulted in the agreed structure of the review. The team carrying out the review consisted of national and international experts. The national team members were made available by Bulgaria, Finland, France,
- English
The Environmental Performance Review of Croatia was carried out by experts from Armenia, Israel, Italy, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom participated together with the ECE secretariat, experts from UNEP and from the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for
- English
The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy included the Environmental Performance Review of Moldova in its work programme in May 1996. In October of the same year, the preparatory mission for the project was organized, and a team of both national and ECE experts was formed to carry out the review
- English
The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy included the Environmental Performance Review of Lithuania in its work programme in January 1997. In February of the same year, the preparatory mission for the project was organized, and a team of both national and ECE experts was formed to carry out the
- English
The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy included the Environmental Performance Review of Latvia in its work programme in May 1997. In September of the same year, the preparatory mission for the project was organized, and a team of both national and ECE experts was formed to carry out the
- English
The ECE Committee on Environmental Policy launched the Environmental Performance Review of Slovenia in January 1996.   The Governments of Albania, Hungary, Israel, Norway, Poland, Slovakia and Switzerland made national experts available for the task. The Bilthoven Division of the WHO
- English
This review of Estonia is the first environmental performance review (EPR) carried out under the auspices of the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy. This pilot UNECE study builds, inter alia, on the experience gained in the preparation of pilot environmental performance reviews of Poland
- English
These Guidelines were prepared by the ECE secretariat, within the framework of the ECE/ UNEP Project FP/2707-92-02 (3002), and with the assistance of experts from: Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland,  Russian Federation and United Kingdom.  The main purpose was to
Апрель  2010Обзор доступен на английском, русском и узбекском языках. ECE/CEP/156 В продаже под № R.10.II.E.8 ISBN 978-92-1-117003-0 ISSN 1020-4563Подготовка второго Обзора результативности экологической деятельности началась в июне 2008 года с проведения подготовительной миссии. В ходе
Октябрь 2009Обзор доступен на английском и русском языках. ECE/CEP/153В продаже под No R.09.II.E.7.ISBN 978-92-1-416051-9ISSN 1020-4563Настоящий документ является вторым ОРЭД Кыргызстана, публикуемым ЕЭК ООН. В отчете подводятся итоги прогресса, достигнутого Кыргызстаном в управлении окружающей
Октябрь 2008Обзор доступен на английском, русском и казахском языках. ECE/CEP/142В продаже под No. 08.II.E.11ISBN 978-92-1-116989-8ISSN 1020-4563Настоящий документ является вторым ОРЭД Казахстана, публикуемым ЕЭК ООН. В отчете подводятся итоги прогресса, достигнутого Казахстаном в управлении
Данный отчет делает упор на прогрессе в управлении охраной окружающей среды,достигнутом странами Восточной Европы, Кавказа и Центральной Азии (ВЕКЦА) иЮго-Восточной Европы (ЮВЕ), в которых были проведены Обзоры результативностиэкологической деятельности, и оценивает существующие проблемы и
Ce rapport traite des progrès accomplis dans la gestion de l’environnement par les pays del’Europe de l’Est, du Caucase et d’Asie centrale et des pays du sud-est de l’Europe qui ont étéexaminés par le programme EPE, et évalue les problèmes et les défi s qui se posent encore à eux.La plupart des
Данный отчет делает упор на прогрессе в управлении охраной окружающей среды,достигнутом странами Восточной Европы, Кавказа и Центральной Азии (ВЕКЦА) иЮго-Восточной Европы (ЮВЕ), в которых были проведены Обзоры результативностиэкологической деятельности, и оценивает существующие проблемы и