UNUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe

Press Releases 1998

[Index]

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE CONTINUES DISCUSSIONS ON STRENGTHENING COOPERATION WITHIN THE ECE REGION

22 April 1998

The Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) continued its fifty-third session this morning with discussions on strengthening cooperation within the region.

Presenting a report on operational activities and cooperation with subregional groupings, interests and initiatives, Yves Berthelot, Executive Secretary of the ECE, said the document raised a certain number of questions, notably whether, in conducting operational activities, preference should be given to requests from subregional groupings or individual countries; and whether activities should be focused on the worst-off transition economies.

In the ensuing debate, delegates expressed support for the operational activities of the ECE and its cooperation with subregional groupings. They supported a balanced approach between subregional groupings and individual countries and they encouraged the Executive Secretary to consider each request on its merits. Many delegates underlined the importance of avoiding duplication with other organizations. It was also pointed out that particular attention should be paid to transition economies, notably those in a difficult situation, and to cooperation in the Mediterranean region.

This morning ECE members also set up an ad hoc working group to establish a set of principles and operational guidelines to govern participation of the business community in the work of the Commission. The aim of the initiative, it was highlighted, was to maintain governmental control of the ECE programme while increasing the participation of the business community. Mr. Berthelot suggested the working group, to be composed of country representatives and members of the secretariat, be open-ended in nature. Work should begin as soon as possible and the first report should be presented at the special session of Commission in the fall.

At the afternoon session, the ECE discussed the implementation of a reform programme and preparations for the Economic and Social Council review of the regional commissions of the United Nations. Members exchanged views on the implementation of the reform and on intersectoral issues and cross-sectoral concerns. A number of decisions on the further implementation of the Plan of Action were also adopted.

The ECE will reconvene at 10 a.m., Thursday 23 April, to wrap-up its fifty-third session.

Operational Activities and Cooperation with Subregional Groupings, Interests and Initiatives

Presenting a report on operational activities and cooperation with subregional groupings, interests and initiatives (document E/ECE/1359), Yves Berthelot, Executive Secretary of the ECE, said the document provided information on the activities of regional advisers, as well as on seminars, workshops, training programmes and operational activities for subregional groupings. Technical assistance was provided to help countries implement ECE policy standards and orientations.

Mr. Berthelot said the document raised a certain number of questions, notably whether, in conducting operational activities, preference should be given to requests from subregional groupings or individual countries; and if activities should be focused on those transition economies which are the most in need of support.

Mr. Berthelot pointed that ECE responds both to requests from individual countries and from subregional programmes and initiatives. Concerning the latter, the ECE cooperated closely with the Special Programme for Economies of Central Asia (SPECA) and supported the Southeast European Cooperative Initiative (SECI) set up in December 1996 to encourage cooperation among countries of the region. The intention was not to create more subregional groupings but to facilitate assistance granted to countries facing similar problems. Concerning requests from countries, Mr. Berthelot highlighted the Belarus project to set up a centre for subregional sustainable development for countries with transition economies.

The problems of resources continued to hamper the ECE's operational activities for both recipient countries and the secretariat, Mr. Berthelot continued. He thanked the 32 countries that had contributed to the relevant trust funds. The substantial contribution of the Netherlands deserved special attention.

Following the introduction of the report, the representative of Belarus said the Government planned to establish a Centre for subregional sustainable development which would develop programmes for countries with transition economies in the region. He appealed to the Commission to support the initiative.

The representative of Turkey said in view of recent developments in Europe, the ECE should redefine its assistance to transition economies; it should adopt a more selective approach now that those countries no longer formed a homogeneous bloc. As resources were limited, priority should be given to subregional groupings and countries outside the scope of European Union (EU) assistance.

The representative of Bulgaria warned that the assistance to groups of countries should not lead to a new categorization of countries. The ECE should strengthen cooperation with both subregional groupings and national authorities.

The representative of Kazakhstan said the country's President had developed a subregional programme to provide assistance to the States of Central Asia. The programme aimed at developing cooperation among the five Central Asian countries and facilitate their integration into both Asia and Europe. A centre for subregional sustainable development was an attractive idea.

The representative of the United States said he did not exclude assistance to subregional groupings or national authorities. The Executive Secretary should evaluate the impact of the programme and avoid duplications with other organisations. The ECE proved it was able to adapt to new situations with the SECI innovative programme which dealt with common economic and environmental issues. SECI was an excellent example of successful cooperation.

The representative of the United Kingdom, also speaking on behalf of the EU, said the ECE should direct resources to the countries with the greatest needs, whether they were in subregional groupings or not; requests from individual countries should therefore not be excluded. The ECE should cooperate with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the World Bank, and avoid duplication with the work of other organizations. He agreed more attention should be paid to granting assistance to Mediterranean countries.

The representative of the Russian Federation said a comprehensive analysis should be carried out of operational activities as a separate agenda. He welcomed the Belarus project to establish a subregional centre for sustainable development for transition economies; it was important to consider all proposals on their merits and for the ECE to follow a balanced approach. The work of the Commission should not be fragmented along subregional lines. More focus should be given to countries with transition economies in a difficult situation.

The representative of the EU welcomed the development of subregional cooperation. The Southeast European Cooperation Initiative (SECI) was a good example of the ways in which the ECE could make its work known. The EU cooperated fully with SECI and was involved in many of the SECI project groups, notably in areas of border crossings and the three energy projects. The EU did not give priority assistance to individual or to a group of countries: priority was established according to the needs of the country and the bilateral ties it had with the EU.

The representative of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC), said BSEC was the largest regional cooperation in existence. Important progress had been made by countries with transition economies, although more still needed to be done to secure self-sustaining growth. With the softening of the political climate, the atmosphere was more conducive to sustainable development and growth. The 11 member States of the BSEC welcomed cooperation with the ECE and agencies of the United Nations.

The representative of the Southeast European Cooperation Initiative (SECI), said SECI aimed at establishing peace and security in southeast Europe on the basis of cross-border cooperation. It had received support from the ECE and had coordinated its efforts with other subregional groups and the EU. Meanwhile, SECI's Business Advisory Council worked to make the region more attractive to investors. SECI thanked all the States that participated in its work and supported its projects.

A number of other representatives took the floor in support of operational activities and cooperation with subregional groupings. The ECE should consider each proposal on its merits and adopt a balanced approach between subregional groupings and individual countries, it was said. Particular attention should be paid to transition economies, notably those in a difficult situation, and to cooperation in the Mediterranean region, participants indicated.

Mr. Berthelot thanked the delegates for their observations and took note with interest of the many points made by representatives, notably that cooperation with various groups should be pragmatic, and that projects should be judged in terms of how effective they could be. He wished to underline the fact that the ECE had excellent cooperation with the Brussels Commission concerning SECI. He agreed with the need to further develop cooperation in the Mediterranean, adding that financing for projects in that region was lacking. He would continue the dialogue and work towards greater efficiency with subregional groups and Nordic associations, in particular in the field of the environment.

Cooperation with the Business Community and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)

Presenting a report on cooperation between the ECE and the business community (document E/ECE/1360), Mr. Berthelot said the ECE's Plan of Action called for the development of further cooperation with the private sector in a transparent framework to ensure respect for the principles of neutrality and objectivity. The Plan of Action called for the setting up of an ad hoc working group to discuss the relationships between the business community, member Governments and the secretariat. Such a working group would establish a set of principles and operational guidelines to govern participation of the business community in the work of the Commission, the aim being to maintain governmental control of the ECE programme while increasing participation of the business community. He suggested the working group should be composed of country representatives and members of the secretariat, and be open-ended in nature. Work should begin as soon as possible and the first report should be presented at the special session of the Commission in the fall.

The ECE adopted the proposal. Some members pointed to the fact such an ad hoc working group should also consider cooperation with NGOs.

Responding, Mr. Berthelot said the secretariat would be in touch with the New York Working Group in charge of a similar task to ensure the thinking of delegates was made known to the ad hoc working group. The intention, at this stage, was to increase cooperation with the business community and professional associations. Cooperation with NGOs with a wider mandate would be envisaged at later stage.

Reform Measures and Preparations for ECOSOC Review

The ECE discussed, this afternoon, the implementation of its programme of reforms. Debate was based on the Plan of Action drawn up last year to provide a comprehensive framework to translate into action the strategic directions highlighted in the Declaration on the Strengthening of Economic Cooperation in Europe (see document E/ECE/1347); and on a note by the ECE's Executive Secretary on the implementation of the reform (document E/ECE/1361).

The Plan of Action is aimed at providing a new thrust for ECE work in the years ahead. It is based on a vision that the ECE would continue to facilitate and strengthen the involvement of all member countries in harmonious economic relations. Chapter I of the Plan presents the general orientations and main changes both for the programme of work as a whole and for each particular area of work. Chapters II, III, IV and V deal, respectively, with cross-sectoral issues, working methods and efficiency, relations with other bodies, and relations with other actors. The ECE areas of work are: environment; transport; statistics; trade, industry and enterprise development; economic analysis; energy; timber; human settlements and coordinating unit for operational activities.

Presenting the report on implementation of the ECE reform, Mr. Berthelot, Executive Secretary of the ECE, said the Plan of Action was being put into effect rapidly and efficiently. Among other measures, the secretariat had redeployed staff, while the principal subsidiary bodies (PSB) had revised their programmes of work and adopted new working methods. The ECE had also reorganized its work; the seminar carried out earlier this week was a successful example of how the organization had done this. Certain decisions remained to be taken, however, and prioritization was still necessary in some areas.

Mr. Berthelot said he was convinced the ECE, with its present flexibility and in the light of the activity carried out thus far, was a useful and effective organization which had extensive expertise in drawing up conventions and setting standards. It was not being used to its full potential, however; greater attention should be paid to how that could be done. Members should "think ECE".

The ECE adopted decisions relating to: the renaming of Meeting of Experts of the Inland Transport Committee and the Committee on Trade, Industry and Enterprise Development (CTIED); the composition of the Bureau of CTIED; the format of the report of the bodies related to the principal subsidiary bodies (PSB) and the review of the ECE publications. A decision on guidelines for the priority ranking of PSB activities was postponed until tomorrow morning.

For further information please contact:

Information Unit
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
Palais des Nations, Room 370
CH - 1211 GENEVA 10, Switzerland

Tel: +41 22 917 44 44
Fax: +41 22 917 05 05
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: http://www.unece.org